zlacker

> As another example, we now believe we were wrong in our original thinking about openness, and have pivoted from thinking we should release everything (though we open source some things, and expect to open source more exciting things in the future!) to thinking that we should figure out how to safely share access to and benefits of the systems.

https://openai.com/blog/planning-for-agi-and-beyond

>>sharkj+(OP)
Well gosh, what could be a safer way to share than giving access to people with money? Since we live in a meritocracy, we're basically guaranteed that anybody with money to spend is virtuous, and vice versa.

>>wpietr+4O
Excuse me, I have to go to the store to get a refill for my sarcasm detector. Your one comment completely emptied the tank.