zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. chaost+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-19 11:10:02
How do children of any specific minority feel when they read historical accounts of racial injustice against their people? Probably really terrible, and maybe even scared. Should they not learn about that history because it makes them feel horrible? That would be extremely unwise since the mistakes of history tend happen again once society forgets.

Old works of fiction also belong in historical narrative because it helps give us a window into popular culture at the time.

(Not that this should matter since my argument should stand on its own, but I’m not white. I just want to preempt any accusations.)

replies(1): >>lozeng+TT
2. lozeng+TT[view] [source] 2023-02-19 17:55:36
>>chaost+(OP)
The point of the book is to entertain, not to make someone feel scared and like an outsider. Dahl also made changes for this reason.
replies(1): >>chaost+kW
◧◩
3. chaost+kW[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-19 18:09:49
>>lozeng+TT
That’s not the only point of fictional works including Dahl’s. Often there are allegorical messages, themes, and satire.

It’s not constructive to stick children’s heads into the ground, especially when that self-chosen ignorance will lead to much worse societal outcomes long term.

[go to top]