zlacker

I think it's actually immoral to change the works of artists without the artist agreeing to it.

>>JohnFe+(OP)
What's immoral is changing the works of artists but then passing it off as the artist's original.

Nothing wrong with changing the works of an artist or deriving new art from existing art so long as you make it very clear it is no longer the artist's original work. That's what ticks me off so much about this.

Some people may buy 2022 versions of Roald Dahl's literature thinking it's his original work when it is not.

I guess writers need to start having sha-256 hashes of all their works chiseled into their tombstones so that alterations can be detected post-mortem.

>>airfor+g1
Yes, I 100% agree. I was too brief in my comment here.