zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. egonsc+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-02-19 03:26:11
I would guess the change was made because they felt ladies and gentlemen does not account for non-binary genders
replies(2):
>>Quarre+C2
>>type0+Ud9
◧
2. Quarre+C2
[view]
[source]
2023-02-19 03:50:16
>>egonsc+(OP)
does that matter when there don't appear to be any non-binary people in any of Roald Dahls works?
replies(1):
>>tohnji+y4
◧◩
3. tohnji+y4
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-02-19 04:07:57
>>Quarre+C2
Oh my goodness how dare he!
replies(1):
>>salawa+Tw
◧◩◪
4. salawa+Tw
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-02-19 09:52:26
>>tohnji+y4
Did you just assume their gender?
(I'll see myself out.)
◧
5. type0+Ud9
[view]
[source]
2023-02-21 23:46:42
>>egonsc+(OP)
they forgot the queers so it should have been "folx" in double-non-binary
[go to top]