zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. kubect+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-09 15:12:04
Beyond Hersh's unnamed source, not that I know of. Again I don't believe it disbelieve it. But I don't dismiss it out of hand because it's not enumerated in an NYT article or a wikipedia page.
replies(1): >>manner+43
◧
2. manner+43[view] [source] 2023-02-09 15:22:31
>>kubect+(OP)
So what's more likely here:

1. Stoltenberg didn't get arrested because he was the son of a high-ranking government official.

2. He had a secret history of collaboration with American intelligence going back to his teenage days that is only being mentioned now in a single line in a paragraph with several other factual inaccuracies.

replies(1): >>kubect+2k1
◧◩
3. kubect+2k1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-09 19:48:49
>>manner+43
Good points, perhaps he was connected with American intelligence at such an early because his father's positions in defense and foreign affairs. Seems even more plausible.
replies(1): >>manner+js1
◧◩◪
4. manner+js1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-09 20:18:39
>>kubect+2k1
Yes, I'm sure the CIA was consulting with a 16-year-old on the Vietnam War in 1975. Very plausible!
[go to top]