zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Rambli+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:01:43
* not yet
replies(1): >>atemer+S1
2. atemer+S1[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:14:01
>>Rambli+(OP)
Well, eventually either the governments will survive, or crypto will. Governments (as nation states) exist longer than crypto, but they have their share of problems as of lately.
replies(1): >>qsort+d3
◧◩
3. qsort+d3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-09 12:21:03
>>atemer+S1
Are you seriously trying to imply that Bitcoin has a greater chance of survival than the concept of a nation state? Is this a real opinion you're holding in your head?
replies(1): >>atemer+w5
◧◩◪
4. atemer+w5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-09 12:34:38
>>qsort+d3
The concept of a nation state exists for around 300 years, and currently in a crisis. Crypto exists for 15 years (also currently in a crisis, to be fair). I think both governments and crypto will survive somehow, but not in their current forms. There might be distributed states, corporate states, fiat states, confederations etc; the “nation” aspect of the nation-state will not survive too long in my opinion (i.e. some people who are alive now will see the end of nation-states). Crypto will be transformed too, perhaps becoming more utilitarian and less reliant on competitive adversarial selection.

This is all speculative, of course, but I have seen the fall of the Soviet system, and I am well aware that forms of government are not eternal.

tl;dr but yes. Crypto of the future will look more or less similar to the crypto of today. Governments of the future will look nothing like today’s nation-states.

[go to top]