zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Animat+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-08 21:49:09
I find your arguments pretty weak. - War is enough of a force majeure, literally the first case. There's no need to sabotage infrastructure. Or at least do it on land, where it's easier to fix. - One very weird way to escalate. I can think of a couple of more effective ways. - There was no wedge after all. Germany got a bloody nose, the Russians as well. Did anyone dare accuse the US immediately after the explosions? No, but they're starting to now, probably judging that there will be no retribution.
replies(1): >>Vincen+v6
2. Vincen+v6[view] [source] 2023-02-08 22:14:24
>>Animat+(OP)
Russia and Europe are not at war. Whether a war that Russia itself started elsewhere on it’s own accord is considered a valid excuse to unilaterally terminate existing contracts - that the courts will decide.
replies(1): >>Animat+ia
◧◩
3. Animat+ia[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-08 22:29:35
>>Vincen+v6
Are they not? Gee, I must've been living under a rock. I'm sorry, I thought you said that if Russia blows up its own pipes that;s a valid force majeure, but starting a war is not. As for the courts, they will decide whatever the country they're based in decides. Simple as that.
[go to top]