zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. abraca+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-08 20:56:56
Considering the context was about sanctions, and no one at the time thought he was suggesting he would blow it up, then it’s not reasonable to try to retroactively change the context.
replies(2): >>econon+a4 >>ErikVa+j41
◧
2. econon+a4[view] [source] 2023-02-08 21:12:34
>>abraca+(OP)
I realize I'm just some guy on the internet, but damaging/destroying a section of the pipeline is exactly what I thought President Biden meant when he said that.
◧
3. ErikVa+j41[view] [source] 2023-02-09 02:41:43
>>abraca+(OP)
He didn't say no gas would flow. He said the pipeline would no longer exist. Also, why would he be hesitant to use the word "sanctions?" Sanctions would be a totally reasonable explanation. What he said clearly implied the pipeline would be forcefully made inoperative.
[go to top]