zlacker

>and not who is benefited by the destruction of the pipeline.

The article itself said that Norway would benefit from the destruction of the pipe line.

>>jdhn+(OP)
> The article itself said that Norway would benefit from the destruction of the pipe line.

This does not make the article more credible, in fact, it detaches the beneficiary one more degree from the actor.

>>jdhn+(OP)
Wouldn't that imply that Norway did it?

>>indymi+kg
You can check the increase in energy exports from the US and Norway after the Nordstream sabotage yourself..