zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. anigbr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-08 20:37:12
The social & physical infrastructure is the story here, not the fact that explosives go boom - although if you don't think explosives are technologically interesting, perhaps that means you just don't know much about them.
replies(1): >>hef198+m1
2. hef198+m1[view] [source] 2023-02-08 20:42:02
>>anigbr+(OP)
I know you can throw C4 into a camp fire without any risk of it going boom, does that count?
replies(1): >>anigbr+a3
◧◩
3. anigbr+a3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-08 20:47:43
>>hef198+m1
Somewhat, but I still think you're being overly dismissive. The story is not expressing wonder at how a thick metal cylinder could be damaged by a relatively small explosion or how a bomb could go off under water where it's hard to light a fire.
[go to top]