zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. trhr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-02 06:24:44
I read it as they're not requiring citizenship, they're requiring clearance, which requires citizenship.
replies(1): >>0xBDB+nM2
2. 0xBDB+nM2[view] [source] 2023-02-02 21:42:45
>>trhr+(OP)
It wouldn't matter if they were requiring citizenship. The protected category is national origin. Companies can't normally require native-born citizenship but any company can refuse to hire non-citizens.

Citizenship is a pretty common requirement in information security in sensitive industries, to use the example I'm familiar with.

replies(1): >>trhr+Mu8
◧◩
3. trhr+Mu8[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-04 16:18:33
>>0xBDB+nM2
Yeah, that makes sense. Who would deny a naturalized American all the rights and privileges? I don't know what people are getting upset about; I don't see anything that says "requires a native-born US citizen."

It says "US ONLY US Citizen," but that only excludes people who still swear allegiance to King Charles.

[go to top]