zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. runjak+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-01-24 16:28:05
Do you mean "upset with Mozilla"? The PWA Wikipedia article claims that Safari has better PWA support than Firefox.
replies(1): >>Snitch+e2
2. Snitch+e2[view] [source] 2023-01-24 16:34:58
>>runjak+(OP)
Per [1], PWAs on webkit lacks push notifications, full-screen display, hardware acceleration, web bluetooth as major headline features needed, which Firefox on mobile appears to generally support per a 5-second glance (I didn't see web bluetooth, but the rest I did) [2].

That wikipedia page has a support table saying IOS supports PWAs as YES and Firefox as NO is odd considering Apple requires Mozilla to ship a crippled form of safari on IOS, if Firefox could ship their own true application, I suspect they would have better PWA support as a differentiator with Safari.

[1] https://thenewstack.io/owa-takes-on-apples-browser-ban-for-p...

[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web...

replies(2): >>Wevah+bu >>dmitri+Un2
◧◩
3. Wevah+bu[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-24 18:21:46
>>Snitch+e2
If I’ve read correctly [1], Safari on macOS 13 (released after the mentioned article) supports the standardized Web Push APIs.

[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/...

◧◩
4. dmitri+Un2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-25 06:10:25
>>Snitch+e2
> web bluetooth as major headline features needed

"web bluetooth" and many other hardware APIs are Chrome-only non-standards that OWA pretends are standards and core features for PWAs.

[go to top]