zlacker

I would say that a web app is worse than a stand alone native app from a open perspective.

Unless the app is open source why would it matter to me if it is build on free and open technology?

I would say per definition a webapp is less free than a native app as its under the control of the server operator and not running locally. I know iOS have somewhat webified apps to let them control if people can run them but the old idea of the native app would be entirely under the control of the user, even if its closed source.

I also dont think a web app can do privacy as well as a native app. A native app you can firewalled off from network access while with a web app you are at the mercy of the developer and server operator.

>>msh+(OP)
With a web app there is a direct relationship between the site owner (let's say HN) and me. There is no Apple middleman in between, making rules about what the service can do or can't do, taking a cut of the profits, shutting down the service at their whim, deciding which updates are good and which are not. Same for Google on Android.

>>pmontr+fb
I think it's bold of you to assume that in a world where Apple decides to have 1st class support PWA's that it won't also come with the same restrictions as native apps.

They'll make you submit your PWA for app store review, sign your asset and JS bundles so all other's won't load, make you support "Web IAP", and go through review again every time you want to update your bundle.

Hitching your "I want to be be free of Apple's platform control" to "I want PWA's" is a recipe for disappointment.