zlacker

Update: As I’ve looked more into the topic the less sure I am now about if I’m correct. I still think that there’s probably little chance that the whole dataset is shipped with stable diffusion. However, I am wondering about if maybe partial examples are shipped with it (e.g. a dictionary of certain concepts) or if there any any other caveats where stable diffusion might contain traces of the original data (note: I don’t think it contains the whole dataset still). I am not an expert so there’s a chance I could be wrong about all of this. So take my words with a grain of salt. Regardless, I still don’t believe the characterization of stable diffusion just copying and pasting images is correct and I believe the lawsuit still is making several factual errors as others online have pointed out.

>>Ephil0+(OP)
Nevermind, asked someone on a Discord who is more familiar with ML than me. Also, checked a few resources online. As far as I can tell there aren't any traces of the original dataset in Stable Diffusion. There aren't even partial examples of the dataset in there according to the person I talked to. Maybe they're wrong, but I suspect they are right. I did read there is a dictionary for CLIP, but that's a bunch of words that Stable Diffusion can recognize and not saved artwork.

Disclaimer: Not an ML expert