zlacker

It feels like "used to train NN" is not well covered by copyright. It assumes people will either just look at a piece of art, or copy it verbatim (or near enough).

Do artists mind a human browsing their work, or buying it? Not at all. Probably even learning from it is fine.

But "thanks for your hard work, my AI has it from here" seems justifiably objectionable for an artist, who would reasonably expect to charge money for this.

I feel for the creators. I'm glad AI is making progress. Not sure how the lawsuit will go.