zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. hhjink+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-01-14 10:45:31
Why does this argument apply to an Artificial Intelligence, but not a human one? A human is not breaking copyright just by being able recreate a copyrighted work they've studied.
replies(1): >>ghaff+7E
2. ghaff+7E[view] [source] 2023-01-14 16:49:00
>>hhjink+(OP)
It depends to what degree it's literal copying. See e.g. the Obama "Hope" poster. [1] Though that case is muddied by the fact that the artist lied about the source of his inspiration. Had it in fact been an older photo of JFK in a similar pose, there probably wouldn't have been a controversy.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_%22Hope%22_poster

[go to top]