zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jimnot+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-01-14 07:59:05
The owner of that Banksy painting certainly thinks so.
replies(1): >>limite+s
◧
2. limite+s[view] [source] 2023-01-14 08:03:45
>>jimnot+(OP)
The painting that has several cuts in about 25% of the surface area? Don’t think that constitutes as a shapeless pile of dust.
replies(1): >>jimnot+G2
◧◩
3. jimnot+G2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 08:25:25
>>limite+s
So what % does?
replies(1): >>limite+hC1
◧◩◪
4. limite+hC1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 21:43:25
>>jimnot+G2
Not a lawyer, but practically speaking copyright is lost when an item ceases to “exist” itself and can’t be restored. If you cut a painting in half - it’s absolutely still a copyrighted item. If you atomize it and don’t have technology to restore it, then copyright is meaningless. What item exactly is copyrighted?
[go to top]