zlacker

lol thinking about this more:

I understand people’s livelihoods are potentially at stake, but what a shame it would be if we find AGI, even consciousness but have to shut it down because of a copyright dispute.

>>yazadd+(OP)
what if they shut us down because of a copyright dispute? :-)

>>yazadd+(OP)
I think the result will be image sharing websites where you have to agree to have your image read into the model.

I think it is likely github will do the same with copilot.

>>yazadd+(OP)
Didn't yesterday someone proclaim generative models can't destroy anything worth protecting? It was about chatGPT but the principle is the same.

>>jimnot+C
maybe a fair price to pay for free repo hosting. wouldn't want my private repos being used for training though

>>readth+h
Seriously!!!

I didn’t say it cuz I didn’t think it would resonate, but it’s a whole new world we are quickly entering.

>>yazadd+(OP)
The real tragedy is being marketed to so heavily that we construe enforcing copyright on llm/diffusion companies with shutting down an AGI. I blame companies like openai purposefully marketing themselves poorly since nobody is going to enforce false advertising laws on something they don't understand.

>>jimnot+C
Image sharing sites routinely steal artwork from the web. My business has a unique logo with the business name in it. It has repeatedly shown up on such sites, despite repeated DMCA takedown requests.

Simply appearing on a shared hosting site should not be enough.

>>Xelyne+QP
That could be a funny movie.

Special agents from the MPAA sent to assassins an Android who can spew out high quality art.