zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. mrjin+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-01-13 08:09:40
It's not surprising at all. Given the intermittent nature of wind/solar power, it would be a huge waste of transmission network capacity built to the maximum producing capacity.

So, unless a storage facility is available, you will continue to see lots of wind/solar power get discarded as it's the most economical way: it's much more expensive to shut down or reduce output of other type of power generation such as gas or coal plants.

replies(1): >>alex_d+O5
2. alex_d+O5[view] [source] 2023-01-13 09:08:49
>>mrjin+(OP)
For a given production of wind I would agree with you, but the installed capacity is only going to go up for the foreseeable, so the network needs to take that into account
replies(1): >>mrjin+fi
◧◩
3. mrjin+fi[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-13 11:09:27
>>alex_d+O5
Oh well, yes and no. Assuming the demand maintains the same, unless something can fill up the gap when wind/solar dropped quickly enough, the current capacity of coal/gas plant simply cannot be reduced or the whole power grid will for sure be brought down by such fluctuations. But if the current capacity of coal/gas plant cannot be reduced, then there isn't much point in increasing solar/wind generation capacity. It's an interlocked problem, cannot be solved by simply changing one parameter only IMO.
[go to top]