zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. TheDud+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-01-13 01:07:50
Why not Bitcoin? You can sell it for cash. Do you not like cash? You can plant trees with cash or lots of other green things.
replies(1): >>cwalv+Gl
◧
2. cwalv+Gl[view] [source] 2023-01-13 04:40:43
>>TheDud+(OP)
If you live in a developed market with no need for the utility bitcoin provides, then to you bitcoin is only a waste of energy, and energy generation is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. In this case you see it as all cost and no benefit, and any counterpoint goes against your dogma, which is 'inconvenient' or irritating
replies(1): >>johnyz+zT
◧◩
3. johnyz+zT[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-13 10:46:44
>>cwalv+Gl
> a waste of energy Not if the energy is wasted anyway (or worse, costs money to get rid of).

> a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions Except if it is wind power.

[go to top]