zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. brilee+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-01-12 23:56:31
6% curtailment seems pretty trivial in the grand scheme of things. Around 20-25% curtailment, it becomes economical to run those hydrogen electrolyzers part-time, even with the capital expenditures required. I wouldn't use that hydrogen gas to regenerate electricity, though - there are many industries that can directly consume that hydrogen gas and avoid the lossy round-trip from electricity->hydrogen->electricity.

I explore this idea further in this blog post: https://www.moderndescartes.com/essays/factobattery/

replies(2): >>prenne+sz1 >>marmet+605
2. prenne+sz1[view] [source] 2023-01-13 14:23:11
>>brilee+(OP)
Does your analysis rely on a localized energy market? Because with curtailment it seems to me that there is no incentive for energy producers to sell energy cheaply to factobatteries, right?
3. marmet+605[view] [source] 2023-01-14 16:04:33
>>brilee+(OP)
Agree. It's also a given that a renewable grid has to be overbuilt. Current estimates are by about 50%.

I don't know what the current target is, but 6% is well below what it will eventually be. The article suggests building more physical infrastructure, but that comes with its own cost and environmental impacts, ironically.

[go to top]