zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Apocry+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 18:32:41
You are contradicting yourself. “The problem was that it was entirely one way.”
replies(1): >>starkd+LL
2. starkd+LL[view] [source] 2022-12-18 00:09:08
>>Apocry+(OP)
Entirely one way in the sense that they were out to re-inforce a narrative.
replies(2): >>Apocry+9N >>nobody+bl3
◧◩
3. Apocry+9N[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-18 00:20:49
>>starkd+LL
What would have made it more of a comfortably multilateral situation?
◧◩
4. nobody+bl3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-18 21:16:59
>>starkd+LL
>Entirely one way in the sense that they were out to re-inforce a narrative.

You keep referring to a "narrative," but you don't provide any details WRT to the ideas presented in such a "narrative."

As such, I have to reject your claims for lack of detail, facts or evidence. Feel free to change my mind by providing such things.

[go to top]