zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
1 comments
1. partia+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2022-12-17 10:14:46
You have a fundamental lack of understanding about coercion, you don't have to make a direct threat of physical force to stop free speech and be in violation of the 1st Amendment.
replies(1):
>>snowwr+zA
◧
2. snowwr+zA
[view]
[source]
2022-12-17 15:51:07
>>partia+(OP)
Coercive speech is a point of concern, but that does not mean that all speech by people at the FBI is coercive.
[go to top]