zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. cmdli+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 05:38:57
Because more important users get special treatment? If you are a user that are of special importance to the business (like politicians, news outlets, or major Twitter users), then of course their requests are going to get escalated more quickly. Twitter isn’t a democracy; some users matter a lot more to them than others, and it’s not really based on political lines.
replies(1): >>wooooo+k
2. wooooo+k[view] [source] 2022-12-17 05:42:41
>>cmdli+(OP)
That's the point of the Twitter Files (tm). Shining a light on how that process worked.

It is of course tied up with partisan politics, who won or lost this week from some particular story, but more transparency is good.

replies(1): >>acdha+Xd2
◧◩
3. acdha+Xd2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-18 00:12:32
>>wooooo+k
Transparency would be full and open disclosure. Cherry-picking for right-wing writers to base stories on is pretty different, as evidenced by all of the people who think there was anything new revealed this week. This showed some of the internal conversations but the story matched what we already knew from statements at the time and subsequent testimony before the Congress. From a transparency win that seems small to non-existent but it’s clearly been successful at giving partisans more ammunition.
[go to top]