zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. scythe+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 05:24:14
Right, but the cop didn't come by so he could look for people to throw out. The FBI isn't just "walking by" Twitter, they're there for a reason.
replies(1): >>acdha+N31
2. acdha+N31[view] [source] 2022-12-17 16:20:42
>>scythe+(OP)
But if all they’re doing is politely asking for the company’s own policy to be enforced, and doing so evenly as shown in the thread it’s really hard to see this in the light which right-media is hyping it. This is the most they’ve found and it’s notable for what we don’t see: no hint of threats, nothing which isn’t a policy violation getting taken down, just a bunch of people doing their jobs and dealing with grey areas.
replies(1): >>scythe+RT4
◧◩
3. scythe+RT4[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-18 21:45:11
>>acdha+N31
>and doing so evenly as shown in the thread

It doesn't matter, and I don't care, if the FBI requests were "even" on some partisan scoreboard.

>all they’re doing is politely asking for the company’s own policy to be enforced

This makes the incorrect assumption that the FBI's stated concerns are equal to their actual concerns. But this is the FBI we're talking about here. If they were actually investigating a crime it would be one thing. But randomly harassing private citizens by rules-lawyering is not appropriate.

[go to top]