zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jacque+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:16:41
I don't see anything shady. And being pretty anti-authoritarian and having been in contact with LE many, many times over the years including the FBI what struck me first and foremost in all of that is that they did their utmost best to keep it clean.
replies(1): >>colord+71
2. colord+71[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:28:32
>>jacque+(OP)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FBI_controversies

And these are just the big ones. They've pushed for back doors into iPhones for instance.

I don't care how trustworthy anyone thinks they are. No one should be able to just arbitrarily transcend the law because they are "clean".

replies(1): >>jacque+w3
◧◩
3. jacque+w3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 04:49:07
>>colord+71
Yes, but that has nothing to do with the subject of this thread, the 'Twitter Files'.

If we're going to discuss the FBI in a larger setting I would consider that to be out of scope, to me the discussion is limited to the interaction between social media companies and law enforcement in general and the FBI in particular.

replies(1): >>colord+p4
◧◩◪
4. colord+p4[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 04:57:15
>>jacque+w3
Please refer the whole thread before claiming it has nothing to do with the subject.
[go to top]