zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. pcwalt+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 03:30:48
> If you run a social media company and the government tells you, "Hey, we want these people banned", and you ban them, is the company "voluntarily" choosing to ban them?

Yes? When the CDC says "we recommend you get vaccinated against the flu", and you get vaccinated, you're acting voluntarily, despite the government recommendation.

replies(1): >>simple+31
2. simple+31[view] [source] 2022-12-17 03:37:40
>>pcwalt+(OP)
So, did you just not read the rest of my comment?
replies(2): >>Apocry+a3 >>pcwalt+ac
◧◩
3. Apocry+a3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 03:54:24
>>simple+31
What duress was Twitter under? It sounds like they happily cooperated because they mostly agreed with the FBI’s recommendations. Perhaps you can call that bias in favor of Trump’s government. But based on the OP account, it was freely voluntary.
◧◩
4. pcwalt+ac[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 05:18:35
>>simple+31
I disagree with the premise that the US has been threatening to take down social media companies, so I didn't feel it was worth responding to.

Also, the guidelines ask you not to write comments like that.

[go to top]