zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. oceanp+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 03:12:23
Yeah, so it seems looking at the emails, which is the only piece of information we are allowed to see.

However if you think about it for a minute, if the FBI were this bold in written, subpoena-able communication, what do you think the offline conversations looked like?

replies(2): >>jacque+j >>djur+da
2. jacque+j[view] [source] 2022-12-17 03:14:58
>>oceanp+(OP)
If they had better they would definitely be showing it. So this is what there is.
3. djur+da[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:35:49
>>oceanp+(OP)
"The evidence doesn't show malfeasance, but if you imagine other evidence that does show malfeasance, that would be bad" is not a compelling argument in any situation.
[go to top]