zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. weaksa+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:32:15
This is what you could say a classic goal post moving comment from the initial position of "it's only ok because it helped you"(which in and of itself is projection and also pointedly false) to "that doesn't matter they were censoring" (which again is false since they asked for the content team to review it.)
replies(2): >>Rosana+a3 >>starkd+Pe1
2. Rosana+a3[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:56:28
>>weaksa+(OP)
There's enough nothing-burger in this thread to start a nothing-franchise.
replies(1): >>jacque+m8
◧◩
3. jacque+m8[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 03:31:54
>>Rosana+a3
A whole chain of them.
4. starkd+Pe1[view] [source] 2022-12-17 15:27:53
>>weaksa+(OP)
Huh? You can simulataneously point to a bias, while at the same time realizing that individual accounts don't always neatly fall into one of two positions. There was a clear indication they wanted to suppress anything that would suggest an idea counter to a certain narrative. That effort even extended to parody and jokes. Everyone makes jokes.
[go to top]