zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. ericns+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 18:21:19
I don't understand why the chain of custody matters if DKIM and DMARC are legitimate ways to verify the communications contained in the laptop. The focus on crack smoking hookers getting clapped by Biden isn't as interesting when it comes to political malfeasance.
replies(1): >>richbe+pl
2. richbe+pl[view] [source] 2022-12-16 19:57:34
>>ericns+(OP)
> I don't understand why the chain of custody matters if DKIM and DMARC are legitimate ways to verify the communications contained in the laptop.

Whether the information is real is orthogonal to how it was obtained. Conspiring with a hostile adversary to release damaging information about a political opponent is also political malfeasance.

The circumstances of how the information was obtained is incredibly suspect and that deserves scrutiny, even if the information is legitimate and actionable.

> The focus on crack smoking hookers getting clapped by Biden isn't as interesting when it comes to political malfeasance.

That's kind of my point: why was that stuff leaked and spread when there was actually damning evidence? To me, it seems like the point was to release as much damaging and embarrassing content as possible to harm Joe Biden.

[go to top]