zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. happym+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 07:30:39
Beyond that, you see a lot of mocking of GDPR rules from American industry and we still have a lot of websites that block on the basis that they want to divulge your personal details to any and everyone.
replies(1): >>rbanff+JQ2
◧
2. rbanff+JQ2[view] [source] 2022-12-17 00:38:18
>>happym+(OP)
And, worse, they abuse the HTTP 451 status for that.

No, I don't live in a country that censors the website - it's the company who owns the website that wants to do things with my data that my country (and myself) considers illegal.

replies(1): >>rosnd+wU3
◧◩
3. rosnd+wU3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 11:15:50
>>rbanff+JQ2
How is that supposed to be abuse? The website is unavailable because the way they operate isn't legal in your jurisdiction. 451 seems perfectly appropriate
replies(1): >>rbanff+Mj8
◧◩◪
4. rbanff+Mj8[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-18 21:36:01
>>rosnd+wU3
It's not the content that's illegal. It's the business practices of whoever hosts the content that are.

There is no government censorship imposed on the content - it's a company that's unwilling to comply with the law.

[go to top]