zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jonath+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 07:03:38
> weird and not ok

I mean, that particular individual is in turn weird and not okay.

But who am I to say? And what does it matter if something is weird and not okay? Lots of things fit that bill, and that doesn't mean they shouldn't exist.

replies(1): >>zoklet+At
◧
2. zoklet+At[view] [source] 2022-12-16 11:31:02
>>jonath+(OP)
If you owned a website like Twitter it would be perfectly fine for you to ban users for posting that information.
replies(1): >>arrrg+QN
◧◩
3. arrrg+QN[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 14:14:27
>>zoklet+At
Sure (in certain jurisdictions). But is that good policy?

Obviously not.

replies(1): >>zoklet+PY
◧◩◪
4. zoklet+PY[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 15:07:08
>>arrrg+QN
I don't see anything wrong with it. The jet kid can create his own website
[go to top]