zlacker

I'm not sure why would anyone would trust what Musk says without independent confirmation...

>>epista+(OP)
I think it's fair not to draw conclusions either way without confirmation. But if that's what's happening here the statements should be framed in those terms, not as a declarations that he banned people who didn't even violate his new rule.

>>darawk+B6
Given past performance, along with behavior like banning links to Mastodon, it's also completely fair to guess that Musk is likely lying again. It's a common behavior of his, and far more likely than some of these journalists lying, when the journalists could easily be proven wrong, at great cost to themselves. Musk pays no penalty for lying.

Edit: that said, there could be some small tenuous grain of truth to what Musk thinks happened...