zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. Brybry+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 04:44:43
Under Twitter's definition[1] the repair shop accessing the contents and sharing them would be considered "hacked".

During the NY Post story, on Twitter you weren't allowed to link to "hacked" material (though this was probably not well enforced).[2]

Twitter changed that policy and reverted the account freezes[3] so that it was fine to link to "hacked" material as long as you weren't directly affiliated with the entity that produced the "hacked" material. [4]

[1] https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materi...

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20200603215859/https://help.twit...

[3] https://variety.com/2020/digital/news/twitter-ceo-nypost-blo...

[4] https://web.archive.org/web/20210301054617/https://help.twit...

replies(1): >>richbe+G3
2. richbe+G3[view] [source] 2022-12-16 05:08:28
>>Brybry+(OP)
If nothing else, this story (along with countless others) really affirms the value of full-disk encryption.

A stranger should not be able to unplug your hard-drive and access your nudes.

[go to top]