zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. zajio1+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 04:14:55
The same argument could be used about cars using roads or even pedestrians using sidewalks.
replies(2): >>kasey_+A >>the_on+74
2. kasey_+A[view] [source] 2022-12-16 04:19:12
>>zajio1+(OP)
Yes. And it is. Pedestrians don’t have any right to privacy in public and we demand behaviors of them for the privilege of using public commons.
replies(1): >>forgot+1x
3. the_on+74[view] [source] 2022-12-16 04:42:06
>>zajio1+(OP)
And when there is publicly available “who’s walking on the sidewalk” data they probably will
◧◩
4. forgot+1x[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 08:19:37
>>kasey_+A
Would love to read HN reactions if pedestrians were mandated to wear a GPS bracelet when outside.
replies(2): >>jeanlo+lC >>kasey_+wX
◧◩◪
5. jeanlo+lC[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 09:11:45
>>forgot+1x
We all do it already with consent, using our phones.
replies(1): >>forgot+3W
◧◩◪◨
6. forgot+3W[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 12:12:06
>>jeanlo+lC
Not everyone holds a cell phone onto them neither there's public data for the position of each one.
◧◩◪
7. kasey_+wX[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 12:23:55
>>forgot+1x
“We should remove transponders from private airplanes as the occupants privacy is more important than the safety they provide” is certainly a plank someone could run on if they wanted to change the current laws.
replies(1): >>zajio1+K81
◧◩◪◨
8. zajio1+K81[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 13:57:15
>>kasey_+wX
Instead of removing transponders, perhaps just randomize identifiers before each fly, so individual planes cannot be tracked?
[go to top]