zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. SamBam+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:12:57
Who was the opposite side who were shutting down journalists?
replies(1): >>coldte+s
2. coldte+s[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:15:19
>>SamBam+(OP)
The Twitter of yore shutting down conservatives and other such "controversial" opinions. I don't care much for bipartisan politics, but the partisan bias in all this is palpable, as is a "the tables have turned and we don't like it so we revert to general principles we pissed on before" vibe ...

It's also comic: pundits pissing on free speech (tons of cheering when people were cancelled before, and lots of articles on how it's justified and free speech is not the be all end-all) making a u-turn to call for free speech and condemn Musk's account shutdowns now, while Musk and co that was defending free-speech before is now censoring accounts, while the "free speech" proponents in the previous round are now cheering him for it...

replies(1): >>SamBam+s3
◧◩
3. SamBam+s3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:30:24
>>coldte+s
Again, what journalists were censored? And for what reason?
replies(1): >>coldte+lW
◧◩◪
4. coldte+lW[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 10:52:08
>>SamBam+s3
The bad ones. For good reasons of course! How could it be any other way?
replies(1): >>SamBam+Kr1
◧◩◪◨
5. SamBam+Kr1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 14:43:54
>>coldte+lW
So you don't actually have any examples.
replies(1): >>coldte+is2
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. coldte+is2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 19:22:48
>>SamBam+Kr1
Yeah, that must be the reason. Everybody can sleep well.
[go to top]