zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. wankle+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 02:46:24
Perhaps he's trying to set straight what Twitter had become, a crazy progressive activist dark haven.
replies(2): >>kuschk+m1 >>philos+86
2. kuschk+m1[view] [source] 2022-12-16 02:52:24
>>wankle+(OP)
Progressive haven?

A law was needed that made sure to personally hold twitter management liable just to make sure that twitter would actually suspend open Nazis (the kind that actually posts swastikas).

[See: Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz]

How is that a progressive haven, wtf?

replies(1): >>tstrim+55
◧◩
3. tstrim+55[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-16 03:10:24
>>kuschk+m1
For some reason people who say things like this are completely unable to understand the data which supports that conservatives are amplified on social networks far more than liberals are. Conspiracy theorists aren't swayed by little things like data.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/feb/01/facebook-youtu...

> “There is no evidence to support the claim that the major social media companies are suppressing, censoring or otherwise discriminating against conservatives on their platforms,” Barrett said. “In fact, it is often conservatives who gain the most in terms of engagement and online attention, thanks to the platforms’ systems of algorithmic promotion of content.”

4. philos+86[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:16:22
>>wankle+(OP)
Could you give an example of the crazy progressive activism on twitter that needed correction?
[go to top]