zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. specia+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-16 02:27:06
Such a weird, self-defeating move. For what is Twitter without the journalists?

Here's yet another savvy take by Eve Fairbanks:

We’re in Denial About the True Cost of a Twitter Implosion [2022-12-02]

https://www.wired.com/story/musk-denial-true-cost-twitter-im...

"But if we judge Twitter’s influence by its active users, we underestimate it massively. It has no peer as a forge of public opinion. In political analysis, publishing, public health, foreign policy, economics, history, the study of race, even in business and finance, Twitter has come to drive who gets quoted in the press. Who opines on TV. Who gets a podcast. In foreign affairs and political analysis, especially, it often determines whom we consider an authority. Almost every academic and journalist I know has come to read Twitter, even if they don’t have accounts."

replies(1): >>throw_+mL
2. throw_+mL[view] [source] 2022-12-16 07:34:31
>>specia+(OP)
It is a bit funny. Just few years ago most people said Twitter is mostly pointless, just a gimmick, and can't really compare to other social networks. It looks it has founds its niche in the end.
[go to top]