Automation gone crazy. I'm likely to believe this explanation rather than Musk personally hitting the "suspend" button on stuff he doesn't like.
> Same doxxing rules apply to “journalists” as to everyone else
It’s amazing to me that despite despite several data points showing Musk would be capable of doing this, people are still giving him the benefit of the doubt.
That’s the power of personal branding.
(Ridiculousness does not justify censorship, of course! Elon's actions and hypocrisy are indefensible)
It's not because of branding, it's because he could do it himself. It's just unnecessarily complex. It's annoying to be accused of falling for branding if you do anything but automatically assume the absolute worst at all times. That kind of rhetoric makes any discussions about musk thoroughly annoying
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-info...
Do wealthy people not have assistants?
"Smithers, ban those guys making fun of me!"
Damn, couldn't even follow his own policy for 24 hours since the accounts seemed to have been banned with no warning.
> Sharing private or live location information:
> The first time you violate this policy by sharing private information (such as home address, identity documents etc.), we will require you to remove this content. We will also temporarily lock you out of your account before you can Tweet again. If you violate this policy by posting private information again after your first warning, your account will be permanently suspended.
> If your account is dedicated to sharing someone’s live location, your account will be automatically suspended.