zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. blinco+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-15 23:02:47
But it's not even copyright. Copyright does not protect general styles. It protects specific works, or specific designs (e.g. Mickey Mouse). It doesn't allow someone to claim ownership over a general concept like "a painting of a knight with a castle and a dragon in the background".

Are there any documented cases where copyright law didn't seem to offer sufficient protection against something that really did seem like copyright infringement but done using AI tooling? I started looking for some a few weeks ago because of this debate and still haven't seen anything conclusive.

replies(1): >>weq+NF
2. weq+NF[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:30:15
>>blinco+(OP)
The problem with "AI" here is that it copies like no other. It copies everything and learns everything like a master because it is fed off a us.
[go to top]