zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. cwkoss+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-15 19:23:14
If a human wrote the prompt, how is AI different from a paintbrush or any other tool of the trade?

Every tool makes some of the 'decisions' about how the artwork results by adding constraints and unexpected results. If anything I'd argue that AI art allows for more direct human expression: going from mental image to a sharable manifestation has the potential to be less lossy with art than with paint.

This feels like a bunch of misplaced ludditism. We need to implement a UBI because 99.9% of human labor is going to be valued below the cost of survival in the next 50-100 years. Always fun to see people thumbing their nose at Disney though.

replies(1): >>rperez+4y
2. rperez+4y[view] [source] 2022-12-15 22:01:04
>>cwkoss+(OP)
I think it is different because you don't need any pictures to create a paintbrush or a pencil. You can still have the AI code as tool, but without the dataset (images), it won't go anywhere.
replies(1): >>Double+9Zf
◧◩
3. Double+9Zf[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-20 13:46:01
>>rperez+4y
You would still need some reference images (or memories) if you e.g. wanted to paint Mickey Mouse.
[go to top]