zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Burnin+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-15 13:58:06
A fascinating angle I heard recently is that when the new tech of photography swept the world, it made tons of painters unemployed.

And that was the main reason for "modern art". A camera can do a portrait or landscape instantly and more precise than a painter, but it can't compete on abstract or imagined pictures.

Will something analogous happen when AIs takes over other industries? I have no clue, but it will, as always, be interesting to see what happens.

replies(1): >>dredmo+u2
2. dredmo+u2[view] [source] 2022-12-15 14:09:02
>>Burnin+(OP)
Any references you can recall on the emergence of modern art as a response to photography?
replies(1): >>Burnin+c5
◧◩
3. Burnin+c5[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-15 14:21:07
>>dredmo+u2
Not really. Don't remember where I read it. It was a few months ago.

I like the explanation a lot, and I think the timelines line up pretty well.

But sure, it could be one of those stories that sound true, but isn't.

replies(1): >>dredmo+Ek
◧◩◪
4. dredmo+Ek[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-15 15:18:45
>>Burnin+c5
Thanks.
[go to top]