zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. wokwok+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-15 12:29:51
Are you being deliberately obtuse?

It’s blatantly obvious that regardless of if it will work or not, they’re trying to get companies with enough money to file law suits to make a move and do so.

> I don’t see the point.

…or you don’t agree with the intent?

I’m fine with that, if so, but you’d to be deliberately trying very hard not to understand what they’re trying to do.

Quite obviously they’re hoping, similar to software that lets you download videos from YouTube, that tools that enable things are bad, not neutral.

Agree / disagree? Who cares. I can’t believe anyone who “doesn’t get it” is being earnest in their response.

Will it make any difference? Well, it may or may not, but there’s a fair precedent of it happening, and bluntly, no one is immune to law suits.

replies(1): >>dredmo+Og
2. dredmo+Og[view] [source] 2022-12-15 13:56:49
>>wokwok+(OP)
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."

<https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html>

[go to top]