zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. random+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-12 09:03:17
Well, that is certainly false, because Chat-GPT was trained on the web and would surely have been exposed to content explaining policies on HN. So if this was generated by Chat-GPT (and it either was or was written by a human impersonating Chat-GPT's banal writing style) then it's another example of why it should be banned.
[go to top]