zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. ChrisR+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-12 08:44:59
I think that puts too much faith in the average person
replies(2): >>dr_dsh+x >>throwa+f3
2. dr_dsh+x[view] [source] 2022-12-12 08:50:16
>>ChrisR+(OP)
But it’s exactly the right expectation for a Hacker News comment. Already HN excels because comments avoid auto-outrage and meme-commentary.
replies(1): >>yccs27+Wd
3. throwa+f3[view] [source] 2022-12-12 09:15:17
>>ChrisR+(OP)
Not to obnoxiously gatekeep too much, but I'd like to think that the target demograph of hacker news is not the average pleb.
◧◩
4. yccs27+Wd[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 10:48:24
>>dr_dsh+x
How high the comment quality here usually is becomes really noticeable when it's lacking under a post. The most common offenders are political posts with outrage potential, especially while knee-jerk responses are flooding in and before measured comments have had time to rise to the top.

Recent example was https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33931384 about cash limits - Sooo many comments are just "Tyranny!", "EU bad!" and overall unmitigated cynicism.

replies(1): >>t0bia_+Yf
◧◩◪
5. t0bia_+Yf[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 11:07:47
>>yccs27+Wd
Their posts has same attitude like yours against those posts.
[go to top]