zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. catiop+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-12 04:45:00
No thank you.

That would be a dystopian nightmare.

replies(2): >>rtkwe+Y6 >>greesi+E8
◧
2. rtkwe+Y6[view] [source] 2022-12-12 05:58:48
>>catiop+(OP)
This doesn't preclude the use of non authenticated account(s) just a possible system of providing provisions for anonymous authentication of humanness. I don't want to slap my real name across every part either but nothing about this requires all sites to adopt it at all.
◧
3. greesi+E8[view] [source] 2022-12-12 06:18:20
>>catiop+(OP)
Maybe all possible outcomes are dystopian nightmares, and we have to choose the least bad one.
replies(1): >>komali+Jc
◧◩
4. komali+Jc[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 06:59:19
>>greesi+E8
Let's for now keep choosing things we don't already think will lead to dystopian nightmares. I'm pretty sure we still have plenty of options like that.
replies(1): >>concor+Bn
◧◩◪
5. concor+Bn[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 08:51:58
>>komali+Jc
We do? What are they?

Current system leads to low quality bot hell.

replies(1): >>komali+4q
◧◩◪◨
6. komali+4q[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 09:14:35
>>concor+Bn
I don't have time anymore today to get into lots of details about saving communication online but I liked how in Neal Stephenson's "Fall, or, Dodge in Hell," internet identity was basically completely wiped out by the proliferation of bots, and identity had to work off of chains of subtle identity attributes that were cryptographically strong because... scifi magic with lots of Stephenson description, you might be smarter than me in that field so give it a pokearound.

Doctorow in "Walkaway" had some ideas about it that I liked as well.

[go to top]