zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. brigan+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-11-03 15:23:44
That's genuinely interesting (have an upvote) but a social media site's responsibility in a situation such as this is to assess legality, not prosecutability, hence it would be removed.
replies(1): >>PaulHo+C1
2. PaulHo+C1[view] [source] 2022-11-03 15:29:59
>>brigan+(OP)
Laws don't enforce themselves.

Anime image boards are not in a hurry to expunge "lolicon" images because they don't face any consequence from having them.

I wouldn't blame Tumbler from banning ero images a few years back because ero image of real people are a lot of trouble. You have child porn, revenge porn, etc. Pornography produced by professionals has documentation about provenance (every performer showed somebody their driver's license, birth certificate, probably got issued a 1099) if this was applied to people posting images from the wild they would say people's privacy is being violated.

replies(1): >>brigan+7o2
◧◩
3. brigan+7o2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-11-04 03:15:20
>>PaulHo+C1
I'm not here to debate the legality of child porn or lolicon images, and I fail to see the relevance of what you've written to the provision of moderation tools to the users of Twitter.

> Laws don't enforce themselves.

What has that got to do with Twitter? Please try to stay on track.

[go to top]