So are we talking about US companies, because the US has a very
very strong right to private property and freedom (and control of) that speech on private property. I don't see this changing anytime soon, nor do I even have an idea of what a legal model of what you're suggesting would look like in the US.
Outside the US this problem typically gets even worse. For one, why is your country depending on a (generally) US company for its freedom of speech? And two, outside the US freedom of speech laws are typically significantly different than the US model.