zlacker

Isnt part of the appeal of federation that each instance/server can set its own rules and moderation teams? Much like Discord / reddit / etc.

>>andrey+(OP)
Isn't this just usenet with more steps?

>>ddalex+63
Well but that would be great, I'm too young to have been part of that magical usenet era that people talk about with such reverence, and these days I have no idea how to get on there, if there's anyone on there I might care about, or whether it even still exists. So a new usenet with extra steps (and, uh, accessible through the http protocol) sounds great to me.

>>ddalex+63
A huge portion of the internet is Usenet with more steps. As it turns out, the steps add value.

>>ddalex+63
USENET never really solved spam. I remember the statistic that at one point one third of usenet traffic was spam and another third was spam cancels. Here's what people felt at the time: https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/writing/rant.html

(the "cancel" message was hilarious since when invented it was unauthenticated, i.e. anyone could delete any post on any group in USENET! This had to be fixed:

https://www.templetons.com/usenet-format/cancel.html )

Also found https://www.gdargaud.net/Hack/NoSpam.html which is a great little time capsule site..

>>bondar+x6
> these days I have no idea how to get on there,

http://www.eternal-september.org/