zlacker

And why not train it on microsoft windows and office code?

>>LtWorf+(OP)
That is a rather good question.

>>LtWorf+(OP)
Because then your Re4ct code would look like this:

    export default class USERCOMPONENT extends REACTCOMPONENT<IUSER, {}> {
    constructor (oProps: IUSER){
      super(oProps);
    }
    render() {
      return (  
        <div>
          <h1>User Component</h1>
            Hello, <b>{This.oProps.sName}</b>
            <br/>
            You are <b>{This.oProps.dwAge} years old</b>
            <br/>
            You live at: <b>{This.oProps.sAddress}</b>
            <br/>
            You were born: <b>{This.oProps.oDoB.ToDateString()}</b>
        </div>
        );
      }
    }

>>LtWorf+(OP)
Easy pal, we don't want to multiply that shyte.

>>LtWorf+(OP)
Exactly, it would actually benefit many C/C++ programmers. Some components of NT are very high quality, why not wash their license if the aim is to empower the programmers and also make some profit?

>>LtWorf+(OP)
> And why not train it on microsoft windows and office code?

As a thought experiment, if one were to train a model on purely leaked and/or stolen source code, would the use of model step effectively "launder" the code and make later partial reuse legit?

>>logifa+5S1
Only if it's not microsoft's leaked code, I guess :)